Archive

Archive for the ‘Rants’ Category

St. John’s issues snowclearing tickets on clear night, irks residents

January 6th, 2010

On January 4th St. John’s began issuing snowclearing tickets as promised. They advertised on the radio and on television. I rarely pay attention to either, but even I was aware of the snowclearing date.

All the same, 300 motorists found themselves with hefty $45 snowclearing tickets the next morning.

Needless to say,  many were not happy.

You leave your vehicle on the road overnight when snowclearing is in effect and you deserve a ticket. I agree with this. Otherwise we have messy streets in the morning because plows were unable to maneuver properly through them.

But 300 tickets on a clear night? City Council is just going out looking for people to ticket needlessly. Random sweeps are fine. The odd ticket for a violator will prevent people from parking on the road overnight. Obviously if it snows, nail them with a ticket. Otherwise, frig off.

There is no need to ticket so many people on a night where there was no snowclearing and the weather forecast indicated no chance of snow.

But if the city must ticket absolutely everyone with a tire on the road, then why not put the money they make to snowclearing?

In one night of ticketing they raised $13,500.00. Take out the expenses for ticketing those violators and you have a significant profit from one night’s work. Surely this kind of cashflow could be put towards improving the city’s dismal snowclearing efforts.

If St. John’s put as much effort into actually cleaning the streets as they do ticketing parked vehicles we’d have wonderfully clean streets.

Local News, Rants, Service ,

Newfoundland Municipal Democracy

October 2nd, 2009

Is it just me, or is it silly that an election for an office of power for the next four years was determined by a coin flip?

I know it’s legislation and it’s only fair that the rules laid out be followed, but it seems like this particular rule was drafted under the impression it was an impossible scenario.

I know nothing about the mayoral candidate from Paradise, except that one is a 19 year old student and they other is a seasoned municipal politician, but I don’t think what happened in that municipality was fair to either candidate or very democratic.

For anyone unfamiliar with this case the mayor was literally chosen at random after a recount resulted in a tie. In Newfoundland that is how we resolve electoral recounts.

Costly as they are, I think that legislation needs to be upgraded to allow additional recounts or a tie-breaking election. If there were any discrepancies from one count to a second, coundn’t it also be possible that the recount was inaccurate?

Could you imagine if a hockey playoff match tie was determined by a coin flip? I suspect people would lose interest in hockey.

Local News, Politics, Rants ,

St. John’s street cleaning doesn’t clean up

August 20th, 2009

A while back I wrote an post jesting that street cleaning in St. John’s is a big money scam for the city to make money off of your parked cars.

Last night there was street cleaning on the street (and there will be again tonight). Most people on the street continued to park as they normally do, unaware of the ticket they were about to receive.

It absolutely kills me that the city does not provide more notification about street cleaning. If everyone is still parked in their usual spots, the street isn’t going to get cleaned, so why bother?

No other reason I can think of than money.

From GregPike.ca: Street Cleaning – St. John’s Biggest Money-Making Scam

Local News, Rants, Service ,

Tim Horton’s Decides to get Political – Supports Anti-LGBT Group

August 10th, 2009

Tim Horton'sThe decision-makers at Tim Horton’s have decided to establish their popular donut organization as a homophobic one.

According to online sources, Tim Horton’s is co-sponsoring a rally on Rhode Island for the National Organization for Marriage. The NOM is an organization that is fighting for the preservation of traditional marriages.

It’s especially notable because it is a direct violation of their own policies:

Tim Hortons does not sponsor individuals, those representing religious groups, political affiliates, book endorsements or traveling sports teams. Tim Hortons does not provide cash donations.

Is this a strategic move or an accident for Tim Horton’s? Either way I hope the message spreads the this donut shop supports anti-gay rallies on marriage.

UPDATE: Tim Horton’s has pulled funding for this event. It was the result of a franchisee ower violating their policy.

From Truth Wins Out: Doughnut Chain Tim Hortons Violates Its Own Policy, Sponsors NOM Antigay Fund-Raiser

Politics, Rants

Street Cleaning – St. John’s Biggest Money-Making Scam

July 7th, 2009

Last night (and the night before) there was street cleaning on my street in Downtown St. John’s. I knew about it because shortly after moving in I got a street cleaning ticket (without warning) and I immediately jumped on the St. John’s Street cleaning mailing list. I also check the City of St. John’s website frequently.

But most people don’t.

In fact, I don’t think the city really cares about actually cleaning the streets. They send the street cleaners down the streets still lined with parked cars and put tickets on everyone’s windsheild. The streets don’t get cleaned. The city just gets paid.

If they were really concerned they would provide some kind of notice to residents and I am sure people would move their cars.

I know there is a mailing list, but I can’t say I blame the people who aren’t on the mailing list. They send an email every day and list every single street that gets cleaned. It’s a mess. You should be able to receive emails ONLY when the cleaning affects streets you are interested in.

I have said this before (about potholes and snow removal and sidewalk clearing) and I’ll say it again. I wish this city was more progressive instead of just reacting to each situation thrown its way.

Signs, flyers, or e-mails would be a great first step to getting our streets clean.

Local News, Rants, Service ,

Microsoft Bashes Browser Competition

June 18th, 2009

How appropriate that my last post was about browsers.

Microsoft’s Internet Explorer has always been one of the most popular browsers, not because people love it, but because it comes installed with Windows and the majority of web users have no idea how to get a new browser (or even that there are options) or they are too lazy to bother.

Internet Explorer, which has a reputation for being insecure, unintuitative, and buggy, has made a claim against the other popular browsers that it is better in every department.

Windows Internet Explorer 8: Get the facts

This comparison chart is an absolute joke. Right off the bat, even if Internet Explorer 8 is all the things they claim to be (secure, private, adaptable, etc), the other two browsers compared, Firefox and Chrome, are at the very least ahead of IE8 in pretty much all of those departments.

IE complies with Web Standards? What a joke. I’ll believe this when I see it.

Rants, The Web , ,

False Verbal Contract leads Bell-Aliant to Bad Service

May 26th, 2009

Written by Jason Peddle

Bell LogoUntil today, I would have praised Bell-Aliant to anyone who asked. I use them for wireless, home phone, and Internet, and have recommended them above competitors to everyone who asks. That all came to a screeching halt today.

I was on a family mobility plan with my mother for the past five or so years. Two cell phones, separate contracts, one bill. My contract had ~20 months remaining and hers was over as of January (or so she thought).

I recently decided I wanted to upgrade to a smart phone. I did the research, picked a phone, and due to my positive experience with Bell, decided to stick with them. My mother offered to take over the final 20 months of my family plan contract and cancel her own, then I’d start a brand new contract in my own name. Three years, plus the cost of the phone. She would take my old phone.

We went to a local Bell-Aliant store and I explained the situation to the employee, who claimed it would be no problem. We filled out necessary paperwork and things went fairly smoothly. I was informed I’d have to pay a $20 fee to swap numbers on the old phones. Fair enough. I was then informed that to keep my own number and carry it to the new account, it would be another $40. So, $60 total just to swap the numbers around. I was really skeptical and taken back by such exorbitant fees to move a number within the same provider, but reluctantly agreed to pay it. I was also informed that the now abandoned account would still sit there for a month and I’d have to pay that as well. Another $35. Ouch.

After coming to terms with all the fees, I paid for my new phone and we left. The only thing we couldn’t do right at the store was cancel the account with the finished contract. We were told to do it over the phone.

Today we called customer service to cancel the phone and things took a turn for the worst. The rep on the phone insisted that the orphaned account could not be cancelled because it was tied into it’s own three year contract, starting May 4th. This was a complete shock. My mother insisted that she did not renew any contract, but Bell claimed that she made a verbal agreement over the phone to renew her contract.

What actually happened was she received a call from Bell telling her she’d receive a $250 credit towards a new phone if she renewed her contract for three years. She was led to believe she could go to a Bell-Aliant store, upgrade her phone, and sign on for a new contract. When she went to the store, Bell had spontaneously dropped the bonus to $200. Not being one to get duped, she said she’d prefer not to renew her contract. That was the last she thought of it, and was fully under the impression that the contract had never been renewed.

Bell had in fact started the contract immediately on the phone. I’m not sure how it can be possible for one to enter a contract without even knowing it, but Bell stuck by this contract as valid throughout our customer service battle to come.

She went back and forth with customer service but in the end got nowhere. They said there was a $400 fee to break the contract and there was nothing that could be done about it. We now had three contracts between the two of us, one which was tied to a placeholder phone number. How did the store not notice the account they were changing already had a contract, I’ll never understand. Two visits back to the store, dealing with several employees, a manager, and customer service again. This mostly led to the store claiming we needed to talk to customer service… and vice-versa. Repeat ad nauseam.

After a particularly futile phone call, I explained the situation very politely and thoroughly, and the rep just continued saying “The May 4th contract is a valid verbal agreement and is binding. There’s nothing I can do to cancel it.” I tried desperately to escalate the call, to get a manager, another service number, ANYTHING, but he’d repeat that statement over and over again.

I understand that verbal agreements are binding in Canada. We did not wish to get out of any services, or scam anybody. We both wanted to continue being serviced by Bell, and in fact wished to sign longer contracts with more expensive plans. Even so, no one had any interest in removing the contract that existed purely to cost us unnecessary money while providing no service in return. Even though we had no idea the contract existed, did not agree to it, were not told OF the contract when getting a new one, and were only getting the new one because the old was was over. What a mess.

We eventually ended up talking to the original employee, who conceded that the only way to make sense of anything was to cancel the new plan under their buyer’s remorse policy (pending less than 30 minutes use of the new phone), switch me to the May 4th commitment, and then separate the accounts. Finally, some hope. After lots of paperwork and phone calls, we seemed to be getting somewhere. I’ll admit, this employee was much more sympathetic and helpful than the rest of the people we dealt with. She even tossed in a car charger.

However, I was then informed it would be another $40 to move my number back again. To the account I paid $40 to move it from. Ergo, $80 total to return my number to the place it started when it shouldn’t have left in the first place. She did manage to get it waived, but the original $40 fee remains. It’s attached to a service I never did receive, but I’m tied to it anyways. In addition to that there’s a $25 fee to separate the accounts. A problem we wouldn’t have had if the bogus “verbal” agreement didn’t exist in the first place. I tried desperately to get these fees waived, to no avail.

I am disgusted by the lack of compassion and understanding displayed by customer service over this issue. It should not be possible to not know you’re agreeing to a contract with or without the promised incentives, and then duped into getting a new contract without being told you already have one. That’s ridiculous. We spent 10 hours today going back and forth with Bell-Aliant and each other trying to sort this mess out. I sure hope Bell doesn’t feel entitled to a useless contract with us because they crossed their wires. It’s money for absolutely nothing. I understand is first line service reps can’t handle these situations, but I was very understanding of that and simply wished to speak to someone who could help me. No one could. No one exists to solve these kinds of screw ups? That’s it? The customer foots the bill for Bell’s issues? Please.

I’m relieved that we shook one of the three contracts, but it was under very specific circumstances and the sketchy “verbal agreement” contract was never called into question by anyone we dealt with. I don’t feel this issue is fully resolved and until all unnecessary fees have been removed, I will not be satisfied. If anyone at Consumerist can suggest who to talk to next, I would appreciate it greatly.

 

UPDATE: Since this entry was posted a representative of Bell has followed up with Jason and his mother.  On her own time once the situation with Jason and his mother passed she contacted any supervisions she needed who had the authority to drop certains fees. Now all of their unnecessary fees have been dropped and they are happy, despite all the suffering they have endured.

Rants, Service

Credit card companies are not happy about the bill

May 19th, 2009

credit-cardsObama’s administration passed a bill today that should revolutionize the credit card industry. The bill will enforce strict regulations on the monster finance companies.

Natuarlly, the credit card companies are not pleased.

In fact, they have gone so far as to threaten card holders that penalties will become stronger and be more severe, annual fees will be higher, and there will be less in the way of points programs.

The bill only has effect in the United States but like many fads down south this should find its way to Canada before long. Regulations are not excpected to kick in until July of 2010.

The Consumerist: Bankers Threaten To Punish “Good” Cardholders If Reforms Pass

Business, Comedy, Rants

Jungle Jims on George Street

March 15th, 2009

When I get treated poorly in the service industry, I am not one to keep it to myself. In this case, I blog.

Jungle Jim's

A few of us went to Jungle Jim’s on George Street after partying for St. Patrick’s Day for a bite to eat. We were seated to a table and Ryan joked about Kristin’s water being just short of “hurled” at her when her drink was brought to her. We started to fill out a comments card as a ruse and began adding things to it as our experience progressed. Not sure what happened to that card in the end.

Just after we all received our drinks, water started dripping on our table from the ceiling. Turned out a toilet overflowed in the washroom upstairs. Toilet water was dripping on us. It landed on our table and splashed in our drinks.

One server jumped in right away and placed a pail under the dripping water as if she was prepared for these types of occurances. When the water stopped the manager came over and asked us if we wanted to move to a smaller table and we decided that as long as the table was cleaned we would rather stay at one that fit our numbers.

Our drinks, still fresh with toilet water, remained on our table for over 10 minutes before our server returned. He didn’t even check in on us when the water hit. In fact, when he did replace our drinks, it wasn’t because he came to us, it was because I called out to him at the bar after becoming frustrated from waiting for new drinks.

Our food was brought out and laid on our table with some serviettes and the server was gone again. Now we were left with food and no cuttlery. Sam took it upon herself to grab us cuttery from the host stand after about 15 minutes of eating.

We finally saw our server again when we were finishing our meal. He asked us if we were ready for our bills and started preparing full-price bills. Kristin spoke up and questioned why we were getting full-price bills after our service and explained our situation. He offered us the staff discount, which was also pretty shameful (as in it wasn’t very much).

Then we paid. When it got to me, I just happened to tell the person ringing us in, who wasn’t our server, how pitiful our service was and he called over the manager for us. Rather than sympathize, he argued with us. We said the service wasn’t great and gave our examples, and he just kept repeating that this type of service wasn’t typical of that server.

We didn’t care if that service wasn’t typical! We care d about how we were treated!

In the end he offered us a couple of coupons to encourage us to return, but Kristin was still sick from being covered in toilet water and that didn’t seem appealing to her.

When we were concluding Ryan asked for the coupons and the manager arrogantly said, “She doesn’t seem to want coupons,” pointing at Kristin. That final comment was really not necessary.

It wasn’t a very nice experience overall, though I do admit the food was good, so good job cooks. Maybe your colleagues could learn a thing or two from you.

After doing a search for “Jungle Jim’s on George Street” (Mar 16th, 2009) I found this article as the second result on Google.

Rants , ,

Canadian Business, what about Newfoundland?

February 6th, 2009

I have been subscribing to the Canadian Business magazine for a couple years now and not once, ever, have I heard them talk about Newfoundland and Labrador. In fact, if this province wasn’t so big on the Canadian map I am sure it wouldn’t even been mentioned.

About half a year ago this magazine released an issue regarding Energy. It was a great issue except for one major thing that rattled my bones; no mention of our province.

Newfoundland and Labrador at the time had just announced Hebron and that the province would have an equity stake in the project. In addition, the refinery at Come-By-Chance was expecting upgrades and a new smelter was to be built around Long Harbour. This doesn’t include the work at the Lower Churchill hydro facility or the Voisey’s Bay nickel mine.

Newfoundland and Labrador is a powerhouse of energy.

82 pages on energy in Canada and not a word of Newfoundland and Labrador.

I wanted to write to the editor, but I saved my breath and just huffed to myself quietly.

Then their latest issue has an article about maritime provinces (finally!), "Go east, young man?" discussing how suddenly Nova Scotia and New Brunswick are "dynamos." The article, of course, does not mention our province. I am dismayed.

The Newfoundland and Labrador econmoy couldn’t be stronger (well, let’s leave out the current cost of oil and removal equalization payments to the province). The remoteness of our province from the global economy seems to have spared us from this recession, for now. Housing values were skyrocketing and people are leaving big cities for employment here. Of course, until recently, Newfoundland has been topping GDP for the country and only a few months ago we were named a "have" province, placing us in a stronger economic position than Ontario (relatively speaking).

How does this slip the radar again? This is getting ridiculous. Canadian Business, expect a letter to the editor.

Rants , ,